New study on densification and displacement in the five largest Swiss agglomerations

In the study “Urban densification and displacement in Switzerland”, Fiona Kauer, Elena Lutz, Dominic Büttiker, and David Kaufmann, commissioned by the Federal Office for Housing (BWO), examine how residential construction activity in the five largest Swiss agglomerations - Basel, Bern, Geneva, Lausanne, and Zurich - contributes to densification and what social effects are associated with it.

The study is based on linked data sets from the Federal Statistical Office (FSO), including the Register of Buildings and Dwellings (RBD), the Buildings and Dwellings Statistics (BDS), the Population and Households Statistics (STATPOP) and the income data from the Central Compensation Office (CCO). By linking these databases, it was possible for the first time to quantify both the structural implementation of densification and the displacement of affected residents.

The study shows that inward development is implemented differently in
the core cities and in the municipalities in the wider agglomeration. While many new buildings are still being constructed on undeveloped land in peripheral municipalities after 2020, new replacement buildings, vertical extensions of buildings and the conversion of industrial and commercial space dominate in the core cities. In Basel, for example, around 15 percent of new residential buildings were built on former industrial and commercial zones between 2020 and 2023.

Despite a decline in the construction of new residential buildings, a net increase in dwellings is evident in most agglomerations, standing for all newly built dwellings minus the demolished dwellings. Geneva recorded an increase of 110 % between 2020 and 2023 compared to the period 2000-2004, while Zurich recorded a slight decline in newly built dwellings of 7 % per year.

The study quantifies for the first time how many people are displaced by
the demolition of dwellings or full renovation. In Zurich, over 14’000 people
(1.02% of the population) were affected between 2015 and 2020, compared to just 467 (0.08%) in Geneva. Households with low incomes, older people, asylum seekers, recognized refugees, and people of African descent are particularly affected.

The full article is available on open access external page here, or through the ETH Research Collection

In addition, Prof. David Kaufmann gave an interview to ETH Zurich about the topic, which you can read here: “Vertical extensions of buildings are becoming a key option for urban redevelopment” | ETH Zurich

Newly built and demolished dwellings per year in the agglomerations
The demolished dwellings are shown hatched and the height between the start of the hatched area and the demolitions corresponds to the absolute increase in newly built dwellings. For newly built dwellings, a distinction is made between dwellings in new buildings on undeveloped land, new buildings on commercial and industrial sites (includes all types of replacement buildings where there was no previous residential use) and residential replacement buildings (demolished buildings had a residential use). Some entries are missing from the Register of Buildings and Dwellings, so that it was not possible to allocate the number of dwellings for each demolished building. The cases in which no dwellings could be allocated for 10% or more of the buildings are hatched grey. In these cases, the number of demolished dwellings is underestimated. If the number of demolished dwellings is hatched yellow, the dwellings could be assigned to at least 90% of the demolished buildings. To differentiate the type of new buildings, all demolished buildings were identified as to whether a building with residential use was subsequently built within a certain radius of the building entrance (RBD GKAT 1021, 1025, 1030, 1040). A 40 meter radius was used for demolished commercial and industrial buildings and a 20 meter radius for demolished residential buildings. If a new residential building is located in the vicinity of several demolitions, the demolition with the smallest distance was assigned. The location coordinates are given by the building entrances of the RBD. All newly constructed residential buildings for which no previous construction could be assigned using this method were identified as new buildings on undeveloped land. In the case of residential replacement buildings on large sites with gaps between buildings, replacement buildings in gaps between buildings are accordingly identified as ‘new buildings on undeveloped land’. The same phenomenon was observed in commercial and industrial areas, given that large industrial buildings often had only one building entrance coordinate. As a result, the category of new buildings on undeveloped land is slightly overestimated.
JavaScript has been disabled in your browser